#12025: get doctest coverage of monoids/monoid.py to 100%
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.8
Component: doctest | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: wstein
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by mjo):
* cc: mjo (added)
Comment:
{{{
sage: is_Monoid(ZZ) # not technical math meaning of monoid
False
}}}
Does this work for any set-like objects? Wouldn't it depend on the
operation?
I think this gives the wrong impression (if I read it correctly) that the
test fails due to a technicality rather than because the test simply
doesn't make sense.
There are binary operations that make ZZ a monoid, right?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12025#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
