#12025: get doctest coverage of monoids/monoid.py to 100%
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.8
Component: doctest | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: wstein
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by mjo):
Replying to [comment:7 was]:
>
> The comment is "# not technical math meaning of monoid". Perhaps a
clearer comment would be:
> {{{
> "The technical math meaning of monoid has no bearing whatsoever on
the result: it's a typecheck which is not satisfied by ZZ since it does
not inherit from Monoid_class."
> }}}
>
> -- William
That's even better. In hindsight, I see that the original comment was
intended read "this does not test whether or not ZZ is mathematically a
monoid." I missed it the first time around, though, so better to make it
explicit for the next guy.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12025#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
