#12025: get doctest coverage of monoids/monoid.py to 100%
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-4.8
Component: doctest | Keywords:
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: | Author: wstein
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment(by was):
Replying to [comment:6 mjo]:
> Exactly, I only have a problem with the comment, not the test itself.
The "technical math meaning" of monoid has no bearing whatsoever on the
result: it's a typecheck.
>
> My suggestion would be no comment at all, or something like "ZZ does not
inherit from Monoid_class."
The comment is "# not technical math meaning of monoid". Perhaps a
clearer comment would be:
{{{
"The technical math meaning of monoid has no bearing whatsoever on the
result: it's a typecheck which is not satisfied by ZZ since it does not
inherit from Monoid_class."
}}}
-- William
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12025#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
