#5048: congruence subgroups are not integrated into the coercion model
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: ncalexan | Owner: craigcitro
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.8
Component: modular forms | Keywords: congruence
subgroup coercion
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Johan Bosman, Georg S. Weber | Author: David Loeffler
Merged: | Dependencies:
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Comment(by johanbosman):
Replying to [comment:20 davidloeffler]:
> Hang on a minute.
>
> It is true that there is a doctest missing for this call method, but the
missing doctest gets added in the next patch in the series (#11601). So I
think we can ignore it here, since #11601 has a positive review; and I can
safely reinstate Johan's positive review.
>
> So: '''ignore''' the patch(es) I just uploaded -- it is not needed. I
tried to obliterate the first patch by uploading a new blank patch on top
of it, but made a hash of that. Perhaps it's time I went to bed.
Indeed. I was about to mention the same thing, but your comment crossed
mine. :).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5048#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
