#12261: Bring Doctest coverage for element_ext_pari.py to 100%
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  roed                 |          Owner:  mvngu       
       Type:  enhancement          |         Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  major                |      Milestone:  sage-5.0    
  Component:  doctest              |       Keywords:              
Work_issues:                       |       Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:  Karl-Dieter Crisman  |         Author:  David Roe   
     Merged:                       |   Dependencies:              
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):

  * reviewer:  => Karl-Dieter Crisman


Comment:

 I'm finding it hard to find any problems with this that aren't nearly
 trivial.  Comments that may or may not warrant addressing:
  * Typo
   {{{
 The has of this element
   }}}
  * `def __compat(self, other):` removed because...?  (I assume this is
 obvious to someone familiar with this code, but they haven't reviewed
 this.)
  * I really like that you actually mention that the doctests are indirect
 when they are.  We need to do that more.
  * You got 'em:
 {{{
 $ ../../sage -coverage
 ../../devel/sage/sage/rings/finite_rings/element_ext_pari.py
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 ../../devel/sage/sage/rings/finite_rings/element_ext_pari.py
 SCORE ../../devel/sage/sage/rings/finite_rings/element_ext_pari.py: 100%
 (31 of 31)
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 }}}
    and testing seems fine.
  * Although not really part of this ticket, one ''could'' add this to the
 reference manual; if so, might as well change {{{See self.square_root()}}}
 to {{{See :meth:`square_root`}}} or whatever the right syntax is.
  * Really picky; is it Pari or pari, officially?  I feel like this was
 unified at some point in our docs.
  * There is a typo that has nothing to do with this ticket but should be
 fixed - {{{probabalistic}}}

 Let me know what you want to deal with on a refresh (probably at least the
 typos) and otherwise this should go in.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12261#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to