#12449: Improve the way that sage evaluates symbolic functions on basic types
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: bober | Owner: bober
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: symbolics | Keywords: gamma function
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Burcin Erocal | Author: Jonathan Bober
Merged: | Dependencies:
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment(by burcin):
Replying to [comment:2 burcin]:
> AFAICT (without applying the patch and testing), attachment:12449.patch
removes the `try/except` block around `return getattr(args[0],
self._name)()`, disabling the call to `BuiltinFunction.__call__` later on
in the function body.
Sorry. I was looking at the code after applying
attachment:trac_1173-move_call.patch:ticket:1173. There is no `try/except`
block in the original code.
Regarding the changes to `sage/rings/real_double.pyx`: IIRC, python's math
module just calls the underlying libc functions. On ARM won't this
introduce new errors?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12449#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
