#12449: Improve the way that sage evaluates symbolic functions on basic types
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: bober | Owner: bober
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: symbolics | Keywords: gamma function
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Burcin Erocal, Jonathan Bober | Author: Jonathan Bober,
Burcin Erocal
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Changes (by bober):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: Burcin Erocal => Burcin Erocal, Jonathan Bober
Comment:
Well, I suppose that I will just go ahead and give it a positive review,
since your changes are simple and orthogonal to mine (and I checked that
all tests still pass on my machine). I would like to get some confirmation
that this fixes things on ARM, but I suppose that we'll find that out
eventually; that's a secondary point as far as this patch goes, though, so
it isn't that important.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12449#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
