#11888: Sage is missing the lambert_w function conversion from Maxima
-------------------------------------------------------------------+--------
Reporter: benjaminfjones |
Owner: burcin
Type: defect |
Status: needs_review
Priority: minor |
Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: symbolics |
Keywords: lambert_w symbolics conversion maxima sd35.5
Work_issues: |
Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Keshav Kini, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Fredrik Johansson |
Author: Benjamin Jones
Merged: |
Dependencies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------+--------
Comment(by kcrisman):
* typo
{{{
SciPy is used to evalute
}}}
* Will this conflict with the beta function patch when it comes to the
random test?
* I'm wondering whether we should add a couple conversions to Mma/Maple
in the init (apparently Maxima is working fine, though see
[http://www.ma.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2011/025861.html this possible
enhancement]). Mathematica apparently calls it !ProductLog...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11888#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
