#11888: Sage is missing the lambert_w function conversion from Maxima
-------------------------------------------------------------------+--------
Reporter: benjaminfjones |
Owner: burcin
Type: defect |
Status: needs_review
Priority: minor |
Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: symbolics |
Keywords: lambert_w symbolics conversion maxima sd35.5
Work_issues: |
Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Keshav Kini, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Fredrik Johansson |
Author: Benjamin Jones
Merged: |
Dependencies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------+--------
Comment(by benjaminfjones):
* I'll fix the typo (tomorrow)
* I'll make the beta function ticket a dependency so the random test will
come out correctly after the two patches are merged in order
* !ProductLog in Mathematica puts the branch parameter first. I guess it
makes sense to be consistent with that convention as well as the
discussion on the Maxima list. I can't figure out whether the generalized
lambert function ever made it into Maxima..
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11888#comment:26>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
