#10682: Upgrade maxima to 5.26
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
   Reporter:  fmaltey                        |          Owner:  burcin          
          
       Type:  defect                         |         Status:  needs_review    
          
   Priority:  critical                       |      Milestone:  sage-5.0        
          
  Component:  symbolics                      |       Keywords:  maxima 5.26.0 
binomial sum
Work_issues:                                 |       Upstream:  N/A             
          
   Reviewer:  Jean-Pierre Flori, Nils Bruin  |         Author:  Dima Pasechnik  
          
     Merged:                                 |   Dependencies:                  
          
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Changes (by dimpase):

  * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Old description:

> I test
>
> {{{
> sage: var ('n,k')
> sage: sum (binomial(n,k)*k^2, k, 0, n)  # is right
> sage: sum (binomial(n,k)*k^2, k, 1, n)  # is right n(n+1)2^(n-2)
> sage: sum (binomial(n,k)*k^2, k, 2, n)  # is false : I get 0
> }}}
> This works correctly on Maxima 5.26 - we need to upgrade! The new spkg is
> at
>
> http://perso.telecom-paristech.fr/~flori/sage/maxima-5.26.0.p0.spkg
>
> Install the spkg and apply:
>
>  *  [attachment:trac10682_1.patch]
>  *  [attachment:trac_10682-reviewer.patch]

New description:

 I test

 {{{
 sage: var ('n,k')
 sage: sum (binomial(n,k)*k^2, k, 0, n)  # is right
 sage: sum (binomial(n,k)*k^2, k, 1, n)  # is right n(n+1)2^(n-2)
 sage: sum (binomial(n,k)*k^2, k, 2, n)  # is false : I get 0
 }}}
 This works correctly on Maxima 5.26 - we need to upgrade! The new spkg is
 at

 http://perso.telecom-paristech.fr/~flori/sage/maxima-5.26.0.p0.spkg

 Install the spkg and apply:

  *  [attachment:trac10682_1.patch]

--

Comment:

 Replying to [comment:82 jdemeyer]:
 > Replying to [comment:80 jpflori]:
 > > IIRC there was a discussion some time ago on sae-devel about make a
 one time huge patch for suppressing spaces but some people, especially
 among sage-combinat, raised the problem that it would break patch queues
 and that we should rather ensure that no such new lines where added and
 fix for previous spaces made locally.
 > For precisely this reason I would prefer not to just remove all spaces
 everywhere.  In code which is changed by the patch, it can be done.  But
 not just everywhere like this.

 would it be OK if we just not apply the reviewer's patch?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10682#comment:83>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to