#10682: Upgrade maxima to 5.26
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: fmaltey | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: symbolics | Keywords: maxima 5.26.0
binomial sum
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Jean-Pierre Flori, Nils Bruin | Author: Dima Pasechnik
Merged: | Dependencies:
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Changes (by jpflori):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
Replying to [comment:83 dimpase]:
> Replying to [comment:82 jdemeyer]:
> > Replying to [comment:80 jpflori]:
> > > IIRC there was a discussion some time ago on sae-devel about make a
one time huge patch for suppressing spaces but some people, especially
among sage-combinat, raised the problem that it would break patch queues
and that we should rather ensure that no such new lines where added and
fix for previous spaces made locally.
> > For precisely this reason I would prefer not to just remove all spaces
everywhere. In code which is changed by the patch, it can be done. But
not just everywhere like this.
> would it be OK if we just not apply the reviewer's patch?
I don't think so. My patch is overkill, but it's no reason to reintroduce
additional formatting issues inside Sage code. If we go on like this, its
going to be a real mess.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10682#comment:84>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
