#11306: Upgrade unitary check for RDF/CDF matrices
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: rbeezer | Owner: jason, was
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: linear algebra | Keywords: days30
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: David Loeffler | Author: Rob Beezer
Merged: | Dependencies: #11027, #10848, #11277
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):
* status: positive_review => needs_work
Comment:
There is some misformatting of the documentation (check
[http://sagemath.org/doc/developer/conventions.html#documentation-strings]
for a template):
{{{
dochtml.log:docstring of
sage.matrix.matrix_double_dense.Matrix_double_dense.is_normal:29: WARNING:
Literal block expected; none found.
dochtml.log:docstring of
sage.matrix.matrix_double_dense.Matrix_double_dense.is_normal:46: WARNING:
Literal block expected; none found.
dochtml.log:docstring of
sage.matrix.matrix_double_dense.Matrix_double_dense.is_unitary:32:
WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11306#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
