#12736: More solver options for GLPK
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: john_perry | Owner: ncohen
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: linear programming | Resolution:
Keywords: solver parameters | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by john_perry):
Replying to [comment:4 ncohen]:
> Did you try whether it really makes a difference in practice ? I mean,
if you replace the arguments by integers and feed it with the right
integer, is it really faster ? I am afraid of Python's own efficiency, and
I wonder if this may not be the real bottleneck :-)
I create & modify these lp's all in Cython.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12736#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
