#12736: More solver options for GLPK
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  john_perry          |         Owner:  ncohen      
           Type:  enhancement         |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major               |     Milestone:  sage-5.0    
      Component:  linear programming  |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:  solver parameters   |   Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A                 |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:                      |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:                      |      Stopgaps:              
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by john_perry):

 Replying to [comment:18 ncohen]:
 > The list of parameters is so long that I begin to look for a way to do
 it with dichotomy instead of trying all the different parameters, but that
 would really be messy `:-D`

 Yeah. The long list of parameters can be a drag, but that's the price of
 enabling everything in GLPK. Alternately, we could decide to take a bunch
 of things off (would people actually use them?) but I'll bet that if we
 remove Gomory cuts, say, then we'll hear something in six weeks. `;-)`

 > By the way, about the string and integer values for the parameters..
 Does it really make a meaningful difference in runtimes ? Just being
 curious `^^;`

 If your focus is a handful of large linear programs, the penalty of Python
 strings v. machine integers might not matter. If your focus is a few
 thousand small linear programs, it could be an issue -- especially if you
 start mucking around w/options quite a bit.

 Admittedly, in my own work I don't seem to need the options after all, and
 I've managed to revise, revise, revise my approach until I'm now creating
 only a few tens of programs, instead of a few thousand. So it's not that
 big an issue for me as it used to be. But it could become an issue again
 in the future.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12736#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to