#12736: More solver options for GLPK
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  john_perry          |         Owner:  ncohen    
           Type:  enhancement         |        Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major               |     Milestone:  sage-5.0  
      Component:  linear programming  |    Resolution:            
       Keywords:  solver parameters   |   Work issues:            
Report Upstream:  N/A                 |     Reviewers:            
        Authors:                      |     Merged in:            
   Dependencies:  #12309              |      Stopgaps:            
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by john_perry):

  * status:  needs_review => needs_work
  * dependencies:  => #12309


Comment:

 I am now getting, on two different machines, doctest failures in `mip.pyx`
 when #12736 is applied. They report different lines (different betas,
 different patches applied, I guess) but the basic idea is this:
 {{{
 Expected:
     Traceback (most recent call last):
     ...
     MIPSolverException: 'GLPK : Solution is undefined'
 ...
 Got:
     Traceback (most recent call last):
     ...
     MIPSolverException: 'GLPK: An error occurred in the solver'
 }}}
 I
 At first, I thought it was just a matter of the space, but then I realized
 the errors were different, too. I'm going to look into this real quick.

 Also, I added a dependency to the ticket description.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12736#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to