#6495: Build the reference manual incrementally
-----------------------------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: mpatel | Owner: tba
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.0
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues: citations
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Volker Braun
Authors: Mitesh Patel, John Palmieri | Merged in:
Dependencies: #12016 | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------------------+----------------------------
Comment (by jhpalmieri):
By the way, searching is broken with these patches. The files
`searchindex.js` (both in `reference/` and in its various subdirectories)
are all essentially empty. Hmm.
It looks like combining the indices should be doable, but a little
annoying: read in the html from each, extract the entries, sort them, and
rewrite to a new index file. The same should work for the module index. I
think talking to Georg Brandl makes sense: if we wanted Sphinx to support
this kind of thing out of the box, what exactly would we be looking for?
I guess at the least we want separate Sphinx documents which share
indices, searches, and inventories. It would be nice to have a specific
"Sphinx Enhancement Proposal", or even some code to contribute.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6495#comment:66>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
