#11930: disallow non-smooth hyperelliptic curves, and let hyperelliptic curves 
know
they are not singular
-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------
       Reporter:  dkrenn                                     |         Owner:  
cremona                                  
           Type:  defect                                     |        Status:  
needs_review                             
       Priority:  major                                      |     Milestone:  
sage-5.1                                 
      Component:  elliptic curves                            |    Resolution:   
                                        
       Keywords:  hyperelliptic curve singular smooth sd35   |   Work issues:   
                                        
Report Upstream:  N/A                                        |     Reviewers:  
Marco Streng, Damiano Testa, David Eklund
        Authors:  Daniel Krenn, Marco Streng, Damiano Testa  |     Merged in:   
                                        
   Dependencies:                                             |      Stopgaps:   
                                        
-------------------------------------------------------------+--------------

Comment (by mstreng):

 Replying to [comment:32 davideklund]:
 > Here are two more beginner questions related to these patches:

 It may be better to ask these in email or on the mailing lists, but I'll
 just answer them anyway.

 >
 > I have a recurring doc-test failure (Sage 5.0 on Mac OS lion) so I can't
 really doc-test these patches locally without failures. But I interpret
 what the patch-bot has done on this ticket as sufficient for a positive
 review as far as doc-testing goes (it seems that all tests pass). Sounds
 reasonable?

 I'm not sure whether just using the patchbot is ok. According to the
 [http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/walk_through.html#reviewing-a-patch
 developer's guide], you are supposed to run the tests marked "#long" as
 well, and I don't see where the patchbot does this.

 As for your failing tests, any tests that fail on an unpatched Sage can be
 safely ignored, they are not due to the patch.

 >
 > The patch-bot's blue blob and the "plug-in failed" I believe is only
 about trailing white space, and therefore harmless. Sounds reasonable?

 In this particular case, it is ok.

 In detail: it seems that many people are very annoyed by trailing
 whitespaces on non-empty lines (see [http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
 devel/browse_thread/thread/f6a783b3a52bfa5d/30809dba7cfb13dd here]), hence
 don't want any new ones to be introduced. That's probably where the plugin
 came from in the first place. In any case, I just checked and this patch
 does not introduce any new trailing whitespaces on non-empty lines. I did
 change two lines that already had trailing whitespaces, which I didn't
 notice, so I did not remove them. That's where the plugin warning comes
 from.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11930#comment:33>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to