#11080: move notebook to flask/wsgi-based notebook
-----------------------------------------------------------------------+----
Reporter: jason |
Owner:
Type: enhancement |
Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker |
Milestone: sage-5.2
Component: notebook |
Resolution:
Keywords: sd31 sd35.5 | Work
issues:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Reviewers: Rado Kirov, Dan Drake, Jason Grout, Simon King, Dmitrii Pasechnik
Authors: Mike Hansen, Rado Kirov, William Stein, Jason Grout |
Merged in:
Dependencies: #11078, #11874, #12229, #11503, #12327, #12899 |
Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------+----
Comment (by kini):
John Palmieri, who is sitting next to me at sage days 41, suggests that we
just not package a repository with sagenb at all. What do you think? After
all, sagenb is considered an upstream package at this point, and we don't
package repositories for those. Plus it's using a revision control system
that isn't included with sage anyway (yet). Also, due to various decisions
by people over the lifetime of the repository, the repository is really
large - 14 MB at maximum compression, at the current master. So removing
it would slim down the sage source and binary distributions by a non-
negligible amount. The docs added at #12229 already give instructions on
how to clone the repository from github anyway. So why do we need to ship
a repo?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11080#comment:299>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
