#12969: Coercion failures in symmetric functions
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.3
Component: coercion | Resolution:
Keywords: symmetric functions, coercion | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Simon King | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:35 nthiery]:
> In any cases, we are just looking for a temporary fix that improves the
situation until we rewrite completely the search algorithm; if it's not
perfect, so be it. So I would say: if all tests pass, go for it.
I agree. The main purpose is a fix of the existing algorithm, so that the
memleak fixes in #715, #12215, #11521 and #12313 work reliably. I am
confident that a fix relying on a new algorithm should work as well.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12969#comment:37>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
