#12969: Coercion failures in symmetric functions
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.3
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: symmetric functions, coercion | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Simon King | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:27 aschilling]:
> Replying to [comment:23 SimonKing]:
> > Question: Is #5457 very close to being positively reviewed? Namely, we
must decide whether we use the old syntax for the to-be-written doctest
(in that case, this ticket would be a dependency for #5457), or use the
new syntax (in that case, due to deprecation warnings, #5457 would become
a dependency for this ticket).
> >
> > For now, I will use the old syntax.
>
> Mike and I already cross reviewed 5457. We are just waiting for green
light from Dan Bump or Franco Saliola. So hopefully (!?) 5457 will go in
soon.
OK. The only problem related with #5457 is the syntax in one new doctest.
I suggest that I provide a second optional patch (like: if #5457 is in
then use both patches, otherwise only use one patch).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12969#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
