#12876: Fix element and parent classes of Hom categories to be abstract, and
simplify the Hom logic.
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery                 |         Owner:  nthiery             
      
           Type:  enhancement             |        Status:  needs_review        
      
       Priority:  major                   |     Milestone:  sage-5.4            
      
      Component:  categories              |    Resolution:                      
      
       Keywords:  categories, Hom         |   Work issues:  fix doctests and 
segfaults
Report Upstream:  N/A                     |     Reviewers:  Simon King          
      
        Authors:  Nicolas M. ThiƩry       |     Merged in:                      
      
   Dependencies:  #11521, #12215, #12313  |      Stopgaps:                      
      
------------------------------------------+---------------------------------

Comment (by SimonKing):

 Replying to [comment:64 nthiery]:
 > Feel free to just skip the failing tests and mention them, say on
 #12879.

 ... and to remove the erroneous documentation (or perhaps: Marking it as
 "TODO").

 I was confident that I have produced a patch (not posted, though) that
 does the right thing with the categories of Hecke homsets. In fact, the
 full `TestSuite` of these homsets passes. However, a surprising amount of
 tests fail, all over sage. So, I guess you are right: One should work
 around for now, and fix it for real in #12879.

 Cheers,
 Simon

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12876#comment:65>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to