I can certainly look into it...I just needed to know if it was ok to do so. Possibly if things like this happen in the future, it could be assigned to me as a JIRA task <grin>.
On Jan 24, 2:16 pm, Scott Cytacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In this case the problem appears to be the test not the code that is > being tested. Since Turadg is now to busy to fix it. I don't know. > > I do not know this JUnit stuff well, one of you people who have used > junit can you look at the test and figure out why its initialization > code is not running in continuum? > > I think the test worked in eclipse, but I'm not sure now. > > Scott > > On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 11:00 -0800, laurel wrote: > > So when you disable a test, who's job is it to go back and fix it? > > Particularly when Turadg wrote it and he doesn't have much time on the > > project any more? No point in having tests if we can simply disable > > them when they stop working. > > > Laurel > > > On Jan 18, 11:11 am, Scott Cytacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I disabled the binaryutilstest, because it wasn't running correctly on > > > continuum. It seems like the setup() method was not run. The exception > > > is this: > > > java.lang.NullPointerException > > > at > > > net.sf.sail.core.util.BinaryUtils.toFileUrl(BinaryUtils.java:65) > > > at > > > net.sf.sail.test.BinaryUtilsTest.testToFileUrl(BinaryUtilsTest.java:85) > > > > Scott --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SAIL-Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SAIL-Dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
