Ok...I think I have repaired this test. Perhaps you could check Scott just to confirm. Laurel
On Jan 25, 8:47 am, "laurel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can certainly look into it...I just needed to know if it was ok to do > so. > Possibly if things like this happen in the future, it could be assigned > to me as a JIRA task <grin>. > > On Jan 24, 2:16 pm, Scott Cytacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In this case the problem appears to be the test not the code that is > > being tested. Since Turadg is now to busy to fix it. I don't know. > > > I do not know this JUnit stuff well, one of you people who have used > > junit can you look at the test and figure out why its initialization > > code is not running in continuum? > > > I think the test worked in eclipse, but I'm not sure now. > > > Scott > > > On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 11:00 -0800, laurel wrote: > > > So when you disable a test, who's job is it to go back and fix it? > > > Particularly when Turadg wrote it and he doesn't have much time on the > > > project any more? No point in having tests if we can simply disable > > > them when they stop working. > > > > Laurel > > > > On Jan 18, 11:11 am, Scott Cytacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I disabled the binaryutilstest, because it wasn't running correctly on > > > > continuum. It seems like the setup() method was not run. The exception > > > > is this: > > > > java.lang.NullPointerException > > > > at > > > > net.sf.sail.core.util.BinaryUtils.toFileUrl(BinaryUtils.java:65) > > > > at > > > > net.sf.sail.test.BinaryUtilsTest.testToFileUrl(BinaryUtilsTest.java:85) > > > > > Scott --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SAIL-Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SAIL-Dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
