Not 100% sure what your asking. With dependencies, I'd want the 4006's to be dependent on the 6500's being UP. But as the 4006's are split between (2) 6500's, as it is now you have to select (1) or the other. Maybe this could be an option for ver 4... :)
At 05:06 PM 7/15/02 -0400, you wrote: >are you monitoring the links or are you monitoring a host on the other end >of those two links. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: gene Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 4:35 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [SA-list] Dependencies >> >> >> I have another question about dependencise.. >> >> At work we are going to make the whole network redundant. All >> user (end >> 4006) switches will have (2) up-links to the (core 6500) >> switches. Each end >> switch will be tied to (2) different core switches. How (or >> can you) set >> up dependencies when you'll be look at (2) different up-link switches. >> Regards, >> >> Gene [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.eclipse.net/~njkat >> To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> With the following in the body of the message: >> unsubscribe SAlive >> >To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >With the following in the body of the message: > unsubscribe SAlive > > Regards, Gene [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.eclipse.net/~njkat To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive
