Not sure to understand the question correctly. entry_2 depends on entry_1 being up.
entry_1 down -> mail entry_2 not checked entry_1 up -> mail again entry_2 is checked and IF DOWN then you'll get a mail, if it's UP you shouldn't get the mail. Dirk. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Tree Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 3:26 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [SA-list] dependencies Dirk, Quick question .. I have a number of checks that are dependent on another check. Occasionally, one of the dependent checks fails, and I get a message [which is good :)], but if the host check fails, I get another message from the dependent check when the host check comes back. Is this by design, or an oversight, or is it me mis-interpreting the results. I know I get multiple 'down' messages for certain checks, at apparently random intervals. I have since temporarily remove the dependency and it seems to work ok, but I would like to replace it. I was supposed to be a quick question, but I seem to have started to ramble.... nt4.0sp6a SA3.2.1087 To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive
