On Mon, 5 Dec 1994 17:21:19 +0000 (GMT), Simon Cooke said: > Basically, look at the circuit -- it looks like it should give the right > result, doesn't it. (I look at it and think so, anyway)... basically, it's > hard to explain, but intuitively right. There's probably some big maths for > it, but I don't know it (yet).
What I said was
1. It doesn't look to me like the circuit should give anywhere near the
right result.
2. I already did the maths. The maths show it is correct.
imc
