> From: Lord Blackadder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: File Types > To: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 27 Jan 1995 16:57:44 +0000 (GMT) > Reply-to: [email protected]
> > > > To Quote Lord Blackadder : > > > .ARC - Rumsofts Archiver > > > .CDE - Code files > > > .SCR or maybe .PIC Screen files > > > .PRG - Program files or we could adopt the MS-DOS *:-\ concept .EXE > > > .TXT or maybe .DOC - obvious > > > .DAT - Generally data file > > > > > > > > > These are all logical - can anyone come up with some more. > > > > > > Howabout EXE for AutoRunning Code/Basic Files, to distingush them? > > I think this is an excellent idea. Thing is, are we going to use .BAS or > .PRG for basic programs. > > N.B. I have always used .PRG so I am biased :) > > > > > Tim > > -- > > Tim Paveley > > > > > What about Driver files - I don't have a copy of Driver, so don't really > know much about it. > > > > Lord B' > Ermmm... why .PRG files? I've always used .BAS.. it seems a lot more logical.. then again, I'm biased because of this as well... :) I personally distinguish between normal and auto running code files by .COD and .EXE respectively.... DMZ ===
