> > want 256 char filenames? > > Well that would be a tiny bit OTT I think...
Agreed, but I think this was just an extreme example... > At the minimum I would have expected enough to be able to store DOS-type > file names (this requires 12 characters). A more sensible approach might > have been 14-char file names (which allows a spectrum-type name to be > followed with a dot and a three-char extension). This sounds the most sensible idea to me. Dan. > imc >
