> > On Fri, 19 May 1995 09:30:56 +0100, Geoff Winkless said: > > ] JP NZ, loop_1 > > > Oooooh. Well done! Using a JP instead of a jr! I still forget... :-) > > Sorry for asking, but could you just tell me why you care? > (given that JP and JR are the same speed on a Sam)
Surely JR is quicker, as it has to read less data in the first place? Once it's read the data, the actual execution might be quicker, but since JP has to read 3 bytes, and JR reads 2, then you're saving a whole memory cycle's worth of time!!! And a whole byte of memory, as well!!! Nige
