Ian Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, Solaris.
Well I did say it was a series of wild guesses. > As I mentioned a few moments ago, the Red Hat version of xv has been patched > to use version 6 of the jpeg library, but the official xv (which we have > here) has not. Ahaha, so it probably is a progressive problem then ... > I am puzzled that you say "A proper XV always could read them" given > that xv was last modified in December 1994 but jpeg 6 was only > released in August 1995. Well I meant a 'working' xv. Bad choice of words. It was all in the context of the broken libjpeg problem with RedHat which since you're using Solaris is a tad, even majorly, irrelevant. Lee. -- I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old ... For some reason my mom insists on calling it "Playing with blocks"
