I agree with you there, that it's not very much memory consumed. Even over 12 hours (what it took to drag all the 32 GB down into swap), I was not seeing any one or two processes consuming huge quantities of memory, Gdmgreeter and python (for Redhat updates) consumed more memory than any smbd process, but they were pretty static. This is why I am not necessarily convinced Samba was the problem, but I also do not know what is normal behavior for Clearcase in terms of memory management. And so far, IBM isn't sharing, either because the person I'm working with doesn't know, or hasn't asked the right person.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Volker Lendecke <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's a couple of megabytes overall. Trivial for 32GB RAM. > It really looks like someone else must be the main consumer. > > Volker > > -- > SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen > phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 > AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
