On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 01:46:37PM -0700, Kathy wrote: > Thanks Volker, regarding Valgrind. And thanks for the reply Jeff. > You guys have made me feel better about Samba, because it supports > what I was noticing in that although Samba memory usage was > increasing, I was not seeing it consuming the amount of memory that I > saw being cached. Maybe I should be asking Jeff this offline, since > it isn't a Samba question, but I would love to know how (if possible) > to tell how much is reclaimable RAM. I have seen certain applications > bring a system to its knees (Cadence comes to mind) once all "free" > memory is cached and we have to reboot because the application no > longer works. To me, that is a problem with how Cadence is managing > memory. Yet on our other Clearcase server, I see it running with > everything cached and is completely happy. Perhaps the only way to > know if the app is happy in this state is to let it run and see what > happens? Unfortunately, the persons I have been talking with at IBM > are still pointing at Samba and the fact that I was 0.01 out of spec > on Samba version. I need to find another resource to talk to there.
You might want to ask IBM for guidance to go to the supported version of Samba. Volker -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
