On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:14:48AM -0700, Kathy wrote: > I agree with you there, that it's not very much memory consumed. Even > over 12 hours (what it took to drag all the 32 GB down into swap), I > was not seeing any one or two processes consuming huge quantities of > memory, Gdmgreeter and python (for Redhat updates) consumed more > memory than any smbd process, but they were pretty static. This is > why I am not necessarily convinced Samba was the problem, but I also > do not know what is normal behavior for Clearcase in terms of memory > management. And so far, IBM isn't sharing, either because the person > I'm working with doesn't know, or hasn't asked the right person.
If you can't spot processes consuming memory in RSS might it be a kernel memleak? BTW, something statically in swap is not necessarily bad. Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
