Jonathan,
>> I really don't want to repartition--again! But yes, your idea is >>intresting. >> > As a point of note that is what LVM is for, the 20th century called and > wants partitions back. Point taken! But really, I had already enough issues with this server, I just wanted to keep it as simple as possible. > Getting back on topic [...] > And then have Samba come up with the shares in "available = no" > configuration [...] This is exactly what I was looking for. I completely missed the "available" parameter in smb.conf. My bad. Thank you so much, and thanks to everybody else for their ideas. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
