On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 09:57:34PM +0100, Aleš Bláha wrote: > Thank you for your help. I will try what you propose as soon as I get > to the machines. But, to be honest, I don't think, the hardware is the > bottleneck. The RAID controller and the NIC in the server sit on a > different PCI bus and each one has its interrupt hooked to a > different CPU. Appart from that, as I've mentioned in the previous > post, I can saturate the network when copying files that are cached on > the server - but only as long as there are several pending requests - > with only one I get just those 30MBs or so (one tcp session vs. couple > of them). I will do some more benchmarks next week, post the > smb.conf and tcp/ip stack config.
One thing you might also want to check is get/put operations with latest smbclient from the git master branch. This does almost optimal streaming smb operations. Volker
pgpFcGD0pFnnJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
