On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:01:49 +0100 (CET) Volker Lendecke <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 09:57:34PM +0100, Aleš Bláha wrote: > > Thank you for your help. I will try what you propose as soon as I get > > to the machines. But, to be honest, I don't think, the hardware is the > > bottleneck. The RAID controller and the NIC in the server sit on a > > different PCI bus and each one has its interrupt hooked to a > > different CPU. Appart from that, as I've mentioned in the previous > > post, I can saturate the network when copying files that are cached on > > the server - but only as long as there are several pending requests - > > with only one I get just those 30MBs or so (one tcp session vs. couple > > of them). I will do some more benchmarks next week, post the > > smb.conf and tcp/ip stack config. > > One thing you might also want to check is get/put operations > with latest smbclient from the git master branch. This does > almost optimal streaming smb operations. > > Volker > Hello Volker, I will try that also, that is after I find out how to build it from the git source. Thanks Ales -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
