Le 2020-05-21 22:28, Ralph Little a écrit :
Hi,

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:07 AM Benjamin TERRIER
<[email protected]> wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 16:25, Ralph Little <[email protected]>
wrote:

Could you also let us know the output of:

scanimage -A

I used first "All pages from feeder", and then "Multiple pages from
flatbed".
In both cases the scanner behaved similarly.

From what you said that would mean that "Multiple pages from
flatbed" is working, but "All pages from feeder" is not.

The output of scanimage:

$ scanimage -A -d https://<device_ip>:443
Output format is not set, using pnm as a default.
Capability : [image/jpeg]
Capability : [image/jpeg]
Capability : [image/jpeg]
Capability : [image/jpeg]

All options specific to device `escl:https://<device_ip>:443':
Scan mode:
--mode Gray|Color [Gray]
Selects the scan mode (e.g., lineart, monochrome, or color).
--resolution 75|100|150|200|300|600|1200dpi [75]
Sets the resolution of the scanned image.
--preview[=(yes|no)] [no]
Request a preview-quality scan.
--preview-in-gray[=(yes|no)] [no]
Request that all previews are done in monochrome mode.  On a
three-pass scanner this cuts down the number of passes to
one and on a
one-pass scanner, it reduces the memory requirements and
scan-time of
the preview.
Geometry:
-l 0..0.0388947pel (in steps of 1.52588e-05) [0]
Top-left x position of scan area.
-t 0..0.0535126pel (in steps of 1.52588e-05) [0]
Top-left y position of scan area.
-x 0..0.0388947pel (in steps of 1.52588e-05) [0.0389099]
Width of scan-area.
-y 0..0.0535126pel (in steps of 1.52588e-05) [0.0535278]
Height of scan-area.

OK, well that appears to be the problem.

You are using the escl backend, and it is not reporting the existence
of a source option.
We would normally expect to see a source option with some variant of
"Flatbed" and "ADF" or "Automatic Document Feeder".

I wonder if Thierry would have some input here?

Hi Benjamin,

Can you tell me your OS and its version!
can you provide me with the log:
SANE_DEBUG_ESCL=999 scanimage -A

Thierry
Cheers,
Ralph

Reply via email to