The name is OK: It's the name that is used (and reported) by the Scanner internally. The Perfection name is just on the box you bought the scanner in :-)
So xsane is working... Did you compile 1.0.13 yourself? Potentially on a system that already had an older version of Sane installed? The strange thing is that I've seen a number of problem reports lately with Red Hat 9. Is it possible that RH did something wrong with their distribution? Karl Heinz On Dec 14, 2003, at 2:28 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> From Karl Heinz Kremer <[email protected]> on 14 Dec 2003: > >> Does the device file /dev/usb/scanner0 have the correct permissions? >> Can you read _AND_ write to it? >> If the permissions are OK, please do the following in a shell: >> >> export SANE_DEBUG_EPSON=128 >> xsane > /tmp/scan.log 2>&1 > > Hn. This is interesting. I just fired up xsane, as you suggested, and > it is fine. It can see the scanner, but with a model name of GT-9300 > instead of Perfection 2400! ( Why is this?) > > But scanimage -L still doesnt show any devices! Why is this? > > Why would xsane see it and scanimage -L not see it? > > Also, shouldnt setting SANE_DEBUG_EPSON make scanimage -L generate > debug output also? It does not. > > Thanks > > > _______________________________________________________ > The FREE service that prevents junk email http://www.mailshell.com > > -- > sane-devel mailing list: [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel > Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password" > to [email protected]
