Send sanskrit mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/sanskrit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of sanskrit digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. roots in verbs (divya naik)
   2. Re: Construction of the interrogative (aarathi bala)
   3. Re: Construction of the interrogative (Mani Varadarajan)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 05:23:31 +0000
From: "divya naik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Sanskrit] roots in verbs
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

Why are the roots of verbs in those particular conjugations only and not in 
any other? Fot example- the root Gama Gaccha belongs to the 1st conjugation. 
Why is it in the 1st conjugation and not in the 2nd conjugation? I know 
there are rules and characteristics of every conjugation, but yet I need a 
logical and mathematical explanation to it. Because sanskrit is a logical 
language and everything has logic in sanskrit grammar.
Hoping for an answer very soon
-divya

_________________________________________________________________
How good are you in a Formula One car? Play now 
http://server1.msn.co.in/sp05/tataracing/onlinegame.asp


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:20:43 +0530
From: aarathi bala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] Construction of the interrogative
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

In the 5th sarga of kumArasambhava, Lord ziva in the guise of a brahmacAri
asks pArvati a few questions about how she carries on her penance.

api kriyArtham sulabham samitkuzam, jalAni api snAnavidhikshamam te .
api svazaktyA tapasi pravartase, zarIram Adyam khalu dharmasAdhanam ..33..

The next two zlokas also start with api.

Aarathi.

> api can be used to derive interogation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/pipermail/sanskrit/attachments/20051221/f88b61a2/attachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:16:34 -0800
From: Mani Varadarajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] Construction of the interrogative
To: tobhalgt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks for your prompt responses.  This is what I have learned, but I have seen
some people insert a "kim" at the end of a given sentence to mark it
as a question.
Is this acceptable?

A related question: is syntax formalized anywhere in Panini, or does
he not deal
with the topic?

On 12/18/05, tobhalgt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A sentence becomes an interrogative if it begins  with API
> Bhalchandra
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:    Mani    Varadarajan
>
> Can someone formalize the construction of the interrogative    sentence
> in Sanskrit when none of the question words (kaH, kA, kim, kutra,    etc.)
> are used? An example in English would be "Are you going    there?"
>
> I have seen different ways of doing this, and some look more    natural
> than others, but I would appreciate someone formally trained in    syntax
> to give me guidelines.
>
> Thanks,
> Mani

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
sanskrit mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/sanskrit


End of sanskrit Digest, Vol 33, Issue 7
***************************************

Reply via email to