Send sanskrit mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/sanskrit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of sanskrit digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: roots in verbs (tobhalgt)
2. Roots of verbs (divya naik)
3. Devirahasya Tantra or Dakshinamurti Samhita....
(Srikanth Pulipaka)
4. Re: Re: [Sanskrit] Construction of the interrogative
(vedvrat arya)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:18:07 +0530
From: "tobhalgt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Sanskrit] roots in verbs
To: "divya naik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>
Cc: "Thattey B. G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sir,
What I feel is as follows :
The Sanskrit language was being used spoken and written even before the
first great grammarian PANINI codified it in his comprehensive treatise on
Grammar called ASHTADHYAYI.
Even before Panini there were a few scattered works on Sanskrit grammar.
For collecting his data for the grammar ASHTADHYAYI, Panini travelled all
over the north of Narmada in India.
During this travel he collected the data on the way the DHAATUs were used
by the people and how they were conjugated.
He observed that there ten types of conjugations which the people used.
He then classified them in ten GANAs.
Each GANA has its own VIKARANA.
The VIKARANA is added to the DHAATU.
DHAATU + VIKARANA = ANGA
This ANGA is conjugated in total 10 Kala and Arthas in the specified PADAs.
The point is that Panini meticulously formulated in his grammar what the
people speak and write.
It is not as if his grammar came first and then the language.
The same applies to NAMAs and LINGAs
Sincerely,
Bhalchandra G. Thattey
----- Original Message -----
From: divya naik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 10:53 AM
Subject: [Sanskrit] roots in verbs
> Why are the roots of verbs in those particular conjugations only and not
in
> any other? Fot example- the root Gama Gaccha belongs to the 1st
conjugation.
> Why is it in the 1st conjugation and not in the 2nd conjugation? I know
> there are rules and characteristics of every conjugation, but yet I need a
> logical and mathematical explanation to it. Because sanskrit is a logical
> language and everything has logic in sanskrit grammar.
> Hoping for an answer very soon
> -divya
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> How good are you in a Formula One car? Play now
> http://server1.msn.co.in/sp05/tataracing/onlinegame.asp
>
> _______________________________________________
> sanskrit mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/sanskrit
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.5/212 - Release Date: 12/23/05
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:46:04 +0000 (GMT)
From: divya naik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Sanskrit] Roots of verbs
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thanks to all who helped me gain an answer.
Regards,
divya
DIVYA
Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/pipermail/sanskrit/attachments/20051227/026435ee/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:50:01 +0000
From: "Srikanth Pulipaka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Sanskrit] Devirahasya Tantra or Dakshinamurti Samhita....
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Respected All,
Please let me know where can I get the complete work (translated to
English/Telugu) of Devirahasya Tantra and/or Dakshinamurti Samhita.
Thanks to you all in advance....
regards,
Srikanth
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: 25 Dec 2005 15:55:33 -0000
From: "vedvrat arya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: [Sanskrit] Construction of the interrogative
To: "Mani Varadarajan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 Mani Varadarajan wrote :
>Thanks for your prompt responses. This is what I have learned, but I have seen
>some people insert a "kim" at the end of a given sentence to mark it
>as a question.
>Is this acceptable?
>
>A related question: is syntax formalized anywhere in Panini, or does
>he not deal
>with the topic?
>
>On 12/18/05, tobhalgt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > A sentence becomes an interrogative if it begins with API
> > Bhalchandra
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Mani Varadarajan
> >
> > Can someone formalize the construction of the interrogative sentence
> > in Sanskrit when none of the question words (kaH, kA, kim, kutra, etc.)
> > are used? An example in English would be "Are you going there?"
> >
> > I have seen different ways of doing this, and some look more natural
> > than others, but I would appreciate someone formally trained in syntax
> > to give me guidelines.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
KIM can be given in the sentence to mark it as a question as the symbols (?)
like question mark are very new, but it should be in the end is not essential.
Some times the sence of question comes out from a sentence without using KIM
due to tone and face impression of the speaker or according to situation.
Vedvrata
[Acharya]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/pipermail/sanskrit/attachments/20051225/716e1d4c/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
sanskrit mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cs.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/sanskrit
End of sanskrit Digest, Vol 33, Issue 9
***************************************
