On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 12:16, Andrej Falout wrote:
> Maybe the temporary answer is to collect all patches provided by community. 
> Anyone?

Andrej,

This could be a good thing. It would allow the SAP folks to utilise
those patches which are deemed appropriate for their environment, while
still maintaining access to fixes/features/bugs for the rest of us. 

In that context, maybe it works to think of it like the Linux kernel
model, with contributors providing many patches, but only the (
benevilent-dictator | salary-paying-junta ) gets the say on what goes
into the offically blessed code base... but there's nothing to stop
anyone else patching their code as they see fit, if the resources are
available.

Most people will still use the offical code, but some will try the other
stuff out. If feedback can be captured through lists or forums, we can
all know what works for better or worse, and everyone can benefit. Also,
if the "alternative" patches work better, are more portable, and end up
becoming a fork, so be it - it'll only happen if there's a need.  

And yeah, I agree we could look at the Firebird model... (having said
that, I know of local businesses using it to keep costs down for
clients)

Richard.
_______________________________________________
sapdb.general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listserv.sap.com/mailman/listinfo/sapdb.general

Reply via email to