That does sound like a good solution! I'll look further into the effort involved in this setup. I know my client would not mind paying an additional fee to Auth.net if this functionality can be achieved without the overhead of becoming PCI compliant.
On Jun 10, 12:23 pm, Bob Waycott <[email protected]> wrote: > That sounds almost silly it's so simple. > Thanks for the tip, Bruce. I'll have to pass that along to clients. > > Bob > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Bruce Kroeze <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Bob Waycott <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Trent, > >> Are you familiar with PCI compliance? > > > Actually, it is possible to do, just not as straightforwardly as you might > > be thinking. I'd love to see it, personally. Check out Authorize.net's new > > CIM offering. It allows you to store customer data on their servers, > > identified only by a key on your side. This includes CC numbers. It does > > this in a completely PCI-compliant manner. In fact, PCI compliance would be > > much easier for Auth.net stores if we made an interface to CIM. > > > It is an extra-fee service, but for many stores might be just the ticket. > > > -- > > Bruce Kroeze > >http://solidsitesolutions.com > > Dynamic Designs, Optimized --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
