we are in the same boat... please update with how this turns out for you :)
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Trent <[email protected]> wrote: > > That does sound like a good solution! I'll look further into the > effort involved in this setup. I know my client would not mind paying > an additional fee to Auth.net if this functionality can be achieved > without the overhead of becoming PCI compliant. > > On Jun 10, 12:23 pm, Bob Waycott <[email protected]> wrote: > > That sounds almost silly it's so simple. > > Thanks for the tip, Bruce. I'll have to pass that along to clients. > > > > Bob > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Bruce Kroeze <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Bob Waycott <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> Trent, > > >> Are you familiar with PCI compliance? > > > > > Actually, it is possible to do, just not as straightforwardly as you > might > > > be thinking. I'd love to see it, personally. Check out Authorize.net's > new > > > CIM offering. It allows you to store customer data on their servers, > > > identified only by a key on your side. This includes CC numbers. It > does > > > this in a completely PCI-compliant manner. In fact, PCI compliance > would be > > > much easier for Auth.net stores if we made an interface to CIM. > > > > > It is an extra-fee service, but for many stores might be just the > ticket. > > > > > -- > > > Bruce Kroeze > > >http://solidsitesolutions.com > > > Dynamic Designs, Optimized > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
