On Wednesday 11 Nov 2009 12:44:35 am Bruce Kroeze wrote: > > I do translation - from what I gather there are several .po files. As a > > translator, I would prefer to have just one (or two, one for ordinary and > > the other for js). These should preferably live in the root. That way I > > can concentrate on translation, without worrying about how the > > application handles it. Django has it this way, and so do most of the > > apps I have seen. > > I did split the .po files, probably messily. However, I'm not in > completely sold on the way we are doing it. To be honest, I'd prefer > to do it in whatever way will encourage more translators to > contribute. > > However, I think that we must have a split for the .po files for the > "very soon to be separate projects." At the moment, that means a > separate file for django-livesettings, django-keyedcache, > django-bursar, and Satchmo. > actually satchmo is next on my todo list after I finish the one I am doing now. I personally feel that the fewer the .po files the better. What you save in avoiding duplication for the translator and across the files is about the same as what you gain in having shorter .po files for the split off projects. Anyway, the programmers are the best judges of that. And 4 is anyway better than 24. (If you are curious, I do Tamil translations) -- regards kg http://lawgon.livejournal.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Satchmo users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/satchmo-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
