On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > Anyway, I can remove that passage, but should I install kdevelop[1] to > > test myself if it actually compiles cleanly on a GNU/Linux box, or > > still insist on providing correct ./configure? > > We don't require the code to be in a working state before approval at > Savannah. > > You could ask the developper to help you compile the application > though.
Yep, I was just trying to compile the project in order to make sure there's no dependencies other than listed by the author. :-) > If the user is using kdevelop, using it too may help with compiling > the project. However I think it should work without it, since it's a > RAD and not a build-time dependency. > > > > [1] On GNU/Linux, I use GNOME exclusively, so do lots of other people > > round the world, I beleive. > > I'm a Gnome user too, but AFAIK kdevelop can be ran under any window > manager. I don't like this idea these days of "I run KDE so I can't > run Gnome apps" and vice-versa. Didn't want to make it sound that way. ;-) I don't like it either, however 'make' can be used under both without a problem. -- Cheers, Alex
