Follow-up Comment #18, task #14945 (project administration): Hi Ineiev,
What I say is the EROFS file system _can_ be licensed as "License: GNU General Public License v2 or later", according to https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility And I still cannot find some words in the web pages that express "Savannah requires GPLv3+ compatibility" directly. Furthermore, there are projects(historical exceptions or what, but I could refer to archive.org to find more evidence) hosted at Savannah that use "License: GNU General Public License v2 or later" is currently actually gplv2. So I don't think there exists a strong reason that can convince me. Thanks, Gao Xiang _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14945> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
