Follow-up Comment #21, task #14945 (project administration): Hi Ineiev,
I summary my thoughts till now: 1) the EROFS file system can be licensed as "License: GNU General Public License v2 or later", not GPL-v2 only (effectively or some other idea don't change the fact of GPLv2+). 2) the Savannah web pages currently don't express "Savannah requires GPLv3+ compatibility" directly, on: http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/HowToGetYourProjectApprovedQuickly/ or https://savannah.gnu.org/register/requirements.php 3) considering effectively, there are projects (the whole or parts of these projects) are GPL-v2 only effectively, which are recently hosted, hosted, and still hosted by Savannah. At last, > We need reasons to convince Savannah admins. (based on if "Savannah requires GPLv3+ compatibility" is true) I could understand there are many exceptions on these projects, but with no exception on our project. Thanks, Gao Xiang _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14945> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
