Follow-up Comment #14, task #16584 (group administration):
> I've carefully read the LGPLv3 again.
In other words, carefully reading doesn't help understand the license. Let us
try analyzing.
* Does your tarball qualify as the Corresponding Source for your package?
* Let us imagine that somebody would like to redistribute your package,
unmodified. What conditions the redistributor would have to comply with?
> 2. Since LGPL wrote that anyone who distribute this library should obey 5
criterion, I will further follow that license to distribute other codes.
I don't think I understand what 'other codes' you mean, and why you say that
you'll follow the license specifically for them.
Please don't top-post. Thank you.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16584>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
