Follow-up Comment #16, task #16584 (group administration):

> [comment #14 comment #14:]
> >
> > * Does your tarball qualify as the Corresponding Source for your package?
>
> Yes, my tarball qualifies as the Corresponding Source for my package.
Because
> my tarball contains all the Corresponding Source of my library(package),
but
> excluding the System Libraries.

Is your tarball source code or object code, and why?  What other forms
of software exist?

> > * Let us imagine that somebody would like to redistribute your package,
> unmodified.  What conditions the redistributor would have to comply with?
>
> If somebody would like to redistribute my package with no modification, the
> redistributor have to publish the redistributed package under LGPL License,

And what are the LGPL requirements for redistributing the unmodified package?

> provided that he/she make a good faith effort to ensure that, in the event
an
> Application does not supply the function or data,

What is that Application in the case of redistributing the unmodified
package?

> the facility still operates,
> and performs whatever part of its purpose remains meaningful,

What facility do you mean?

> or under the GNU
> GPL, with none of the additional permissions of this License applicable to
> that copy.

You are right, the LGPL offers an option to switch to the GPL; however,
"this license" is ambigous in our context---we have at least the GPL
and the LGPL at hand.  Please care to make your words clear.

> > > 2. Since LGPL wrote that anyone who distribute this library should obey
5
> criterion, I will further follow that license to distribute other codes.
> >
> > I don't think I understand what 'other codes' you mean, and why you say
that
> you'll follow the license specifically for them.
>
> The codes except the codes of StoneValley mixed with StoneValley called the
> Combined Works.

And what code besides the code of StoneValley is mixed with StoneValley?

> If someone would redistribute a combined work, he/she must:

You said, "I," not "someone."  Do you understand the difference?


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16584>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to