Thank you David! That was it, turned out that I was actually launching
harbor in one of my inputs :/ My fault. 8005 port has confused me
probably, since I was setting it to 8890 globally and not seeing the
change. But will that mean that for every liquidsoap process I will
need a separate harbor? Is it possible to interrupt all running
processes with single live input? Or I will need to run all channels
on single process to achieve that?
Davit Barbakadze
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:23 PM, David Baelde <david.bae...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not the dev behind harbor, so I can't give an in-depth answer, but
> I should be able to point in the right direction...
>
> I just checked on a SVN build that I have running on my server, it's
> version r8154 and it doesn't have a 8005 port open. I believe other
> versions behave the same. It must be that you have a harbor input
> somehow, or perhaps a http service enabled in your liquidsoap
> scripts... did you check includes, everything?
>
> Note that the configuration of harbor changed a bit recently: almost
> everything is local to each harbor instance now. No more
> set("harbor.port",xxx), use input.harbor(port=xxx,...) instead.
>
> We'll figure this out!
> --
> David
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Savonet-users mailing list
Savonet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/savonet-users
